Joy-Gaba and Nosek (2010): The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
 
Citation Information
How to Cite
Jennifer; Brian, 2009-08-06, "Joy-Gaba and Nosek (2010): The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations", hdl:1902.1/13405 Brian Nosek [Distributor]
Study Global Idhdl:1902.1/13405
AuthorsJennifer (Joy-Gaba); Brian (Nosek)
ProducerJennifer Joy-Gaba, University of Virginia
Production Date2009
DistributorBrian Nosek, University of Virginia
Distributor ContactJennifer Joy-Gaba (University of Virginia), jaj3f@virginia.edu
Distribution DateAugust 06, 2009
Deposit DateAugust 06, 2009
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

Implicit preferences for Whites compared to Blacks can be reduced via exposure to admired Black and disliked White individuals (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001). In four studies (total N=4,628), while attempting clarify the mechanism, we found that implicit preferences for Whites were weaker in the “positive Blacks” exposure condition compared to a control condition (weighted average d=.08). This effect was substantially smaller than the original demonstration (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; d=.82). Factors beyond exposure to admired Blacks may be necessary for the effect, such as making race accessible during exemplar exposure, and including negative White exemplars. Our evidence suggests that exposure to known-group members shifts implicit race bias reliably, but weakly.

Abstract Date2009
Related PublicationsJoy-Gaba, J. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit race evaluations. Social Psychology.
Related Materialhttp://briannosek.com/papers/
Time Period Covered2009 - 2009
Date of Collection2007 - 2009
Terms of Use
Network Terms of UseIQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

BY CLICKING THE "I AGREE" CHECKBOX BELOW, I CONFIRM THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD EACH AND EVERY TERM SET FORTH IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF DATA FOUND ABOVE, AND I AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

IF I DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, I MUST NOT DOWNLOAD THE MATERIALS.