Frederick J. Boehmke's Dataverse Page

Replication data for: Using Auxiliary Data to Estimate Selection Bias Models, With an Application to Interest Group Use of the Direct Initiative Process
hdl:1902.1/10212 UNF:3:MdCmHQFlPB2CIFkIWgEdRw==
Version: 1 – Released: Wed Jan 21 10:20:11 EST 2009
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
Versions
 
If you use these data, please add the following citation to your scholarly references. Why cite?
Original Publication
Results found in this publication can be replicated using these data.
Frederick J. Boehmke. 2003. "Using Auxiliary Data to Estimate Selection Bias Models, With an Application to Interest Group Use of the Direct Initiative Process." Political Analysis: Volume 11 (Summer 2003): 234-254. article available here
Data Citation Details
Study Global IDhdl:1902.1/10212
AuthorsFrederick J. Boehmke (University of Iowa)
Production Date2003
DistributorFrederick J. Boehmke Logo
Distributor Contactfrederick-boehmke@uiowa.edu
Distribution Date2007
Deposit Date2007
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

Recent work in survey research has made progress in estimating models involving selection bias in a particularly difficult circumstance—all non-respondents are unit non-responders, meaning that no data are available for them. These models are reasonably successful in circumstances where the dependent variable of interest is continuous, but they are less practical empirically when it is latent and only discrete outcomes or choices are observed. I develop a method in this article to estimate these models that is much more practical in terms of estimation. The model uses a small amount of auxiliary information to estimate the selection equation parameters, which are then held fixed while estimating the equation of interest parameters in a maximum-likelihood setting. After presenting Monte Carlo analyses to support the model, I apply the technique to a substantive problem: Which interest groups are likely to be involved in support of potential initiatives to achieve their policy goals?

Data Availability
Number of Files 4
Terms of Use
Dataverse Network Terms of Use
View Terms of Use [+]
IQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET
Other Information
NotesDATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 (STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0) This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.

"Replication data for: Using Auxiliary Data to Estimate Selection Bias Models, With an Application to Interest Group Use of the Direct Initiative Process", hdl:1902.1/10212