logo
Perfecting Imperfect Competition [Dataset]
hdl:1902.1/13844
Version: 1 – Released: Thu Nov 26 05:19:49 EST 2009
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
Versions
 
If you use these data, please add the following citation to your scholarly references. Why cite?
Data Citation Details
Study Global IDhdl:1902.1/13844
AuthorsGoetz Seißer (Maastricht University)
Production Date2008
Software Excel
DistributorEconomics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal Logo
Distributor ContactKorinna Werner-Schwarz (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), korinna.werner-schwarz@economics-ejournal.org
Distribution Date2008
Deposit DateNovember 03, 2009
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

This paper addresses the reduction of market failure under imperfect competition. It proposes a tax-scheme that provides firms with an incentive to forgo their market power: Firms optimize after‐tax profits. Now simply consider a firm’s gross profit margin the unique tax‐rate it is charged on absolute profits. In theory the firm’s tax‐rate would be the mark‐up over marginal costs, the firm’s Lerner index. As a result every firm determines its own tax‐rate by setting its price and incurring costs. This creates a new trade off for firms between a low tax‐burden and the exercising of market power. Welfare for society increases since firms with market power choose a lower price and produce a quantity closer or equal to social optimum; at the original monopolistic price‐level they can increase their profits by lowering their tax‐burden. Essentially the tax‐condition does not seem to distort profit incentives or markets; under perfect competition the tax‐rate would be zero. Thus, it is clear that the tax only takes effect when markets work inefficiently and its countervailing nature subsequently helps to remedy inefficiencies of imperfectly competitive markets.

Abstract Date2008
KeywordsImperfect competition; Market power; Tax-condition; Monopoly; Welfare; Efficiency
Topic ClassificationD00 (JEL); D21 (JEL); D40 (JEL); H21 (JEL); H25 (JEL); H26 (JEL); P11 (JEL)
Related PublicationsGoetz Seißer (2008). Perfecting Imperfect Competition. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2008-28. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-28
Kind of Dataaggregate data
Data Availability
Number of Files 2
Terms of Use
Dataverse Network Terms of Use
View Terms of Use [+]
IQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

"Perfecting Imperfect Competition [Dataset]", hdl:1902.1/13844