Congressional organization and politics seems to change roughly every generation. The literature has identified 12 eras of congressional organization—outlined in Table 1 (see Galloway 1976, Hinckley 1988)—that can be classified by their degree of centralization of power. In some eras, strong party leaders (such as Joe Cannon or Newt Gingrich) control legislative organization and policy outputs. In other eras, control is decentralized to committee chairs, subcommittee chairs, nonpartisan coalitions, and so on.

We present two polar models of agenda power. In what follows we contrast these two models with each other and test their predictions head-to-head. Using outcomes from the 45th to 99th Congresses (1877 to 1986), we find that we can reject the floor agenda model. In contrast, there is substantial and credible evidence supporting the cartel agenda model. In particular, we show that negative agenda control is indeed a largely invariant advantage of majority status; and that positive agenda control is variable, changing with the internal homogeneity of the majority party. Variations in these two aspects of agenda control, we suggest, explain some of the basic tensions and historical fluctuations in congressional organization.

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

1. I will not use the Materials to
   1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
   2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
   3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

BY CLICKING THE "I AGREE" CHECKBOX BELOW, I CONFIRM THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD EACH AND EVERY TERM SET FORTH IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF DATA FOUND ABOVE, AND I AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

IF I DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, I MUST NOT DOWNLOAD THE MATERIALS.