Skip to Content

College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jake Bowers' Homepage
Replication data for: Attributing Effects to A Cluster Randomized Get-Out-The-Vote Campaign: The Compendium
hdl:1902.1/12174
Version: 1 – Released: Fri Dec 12 22:15:14 EST 2008
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
Versions
 
If you use these data, please add the following citation to your scholarly references. Why cite?
Original Publication
Results found in this publication can be replicated using these data.
Hansen, B. B. and Bowers, J. (2009). Attributing effects to a cluster randomized get-out-the-vote campaign. Journal of the American Statistical Association, to appear.
Data Citation Details
Study Global IDhdl:1902.1/12174
AuthorsJake Bowers; Ben B. Hansen ; Mark Fredrickson
ProducerJake Bowers
Production DateAugust 27, 2008
DistributorJake Bowers
Distributor ContactJake Bowers, jwbowers@illinois.edu
Distribution DateSeptember 26, 2008
Deposit DateDecember 12, 2008
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

Early in the twentieth century, Fisher and Neyman demonstrated how to infer effects of agricultural interventions using only the very weakest of assumptions, by randomly varying which plots were to be manipulated. Although the methods permitted uncontrolled variation between experimental units, they required strict control over assignment of interventions; this hindered their application to field studies with human subjects, who could not ordinarily be compelled to comply with experimenters' instructions. In 1996, however, Angrist, Imbens and Rubin showed that inferences from randomized studies could accommodate non-compliance without significant strengthening of assumptions. Political scientists A. Gerber and D. Green responded quickly, fielding a randomized study of voter turnout campaigns in the November 1998 general election. Non-contacts and refusals were frequent, but Gerber and Green analyzed their data in the style of Angrist et al., avoiding having to model non-response. They did use models for other purposes: to address complexities of the randomization scheme; to permit heterogeneity among voters and campaigners; to account for deviations from experimental protocol; and to take advantage of highly informative covariates. Although the added assumptions seemed straightforward and unassailable, a later analysis found them to be at odds with Gerber and Green's data. Using a different model, it reaches the very opposite of Gerber and Green's central conclusion about getting out the vote. This paper shows that neither of the models are necessary, addressing all of the complications of Gerber and Green's study using methods in the tradition of Fisher and Neyman. To do this, it merges recent developments in randomization-based inference for comparative studies with somewhat older developments in design-based analysis of sample surveys. The method involves regression, but large-sample analysis and simulations demonstrate its lack of dependence on regression assumptions. Its substantive results have consequences both for the design of campaigns to increase voter participation and for theories of political behavior more generally.

Keywordscluster randomization, group randomized trial, instrumental variable, model-assisted, randomization inference, voter turnout
Related PublicationsHansen, B. B. and Bowers, J. (2008). Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Statistical Science, 23(2):219–236.
Kind of DataReproduction archive.
Data Availability
Number of Files 1
Terms of Use
Dataverse Network Terms of Use
View Terms of Use [+]
IQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

"Replication data for: Attributing Effects to A Cluster Randomized Get-Out-The-Vote Campaign: The Compendium", hdl:1902.1/12174