Replication data for: The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
 
Citation Information
How to Cite
Kevin T. McGuire; James A. Stimson, 2007, "Replication data for: The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences", hdl:1902.1/10301 UNF:3:B3xKEt8tgZ91vyY6+QcMQQ== Kevin T. McGuire [Distributor]
Study Global Idhdl:1902.1/10301
AuthorsKevin T. McGuire (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill); James A. Stimson (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
Production Date2004
DistributorKevin T. McGuire Logo
Distributor Contactkmcguire@unc.edu
Distribution Date2007
Deposit Date2007
Replication ForKevin T. McGuire. 2004. The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences with James A. Stimson. Journal of Politics 66:1018-1035. article available here
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

With competing assumptions and alternative empirical models, scholars have come to rather different conclusions about the impact of public preferences on the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Some have found the justices to be attentive to mass opinion, while others have judged it to be irrelevant. Across this divide, however, one assumption is widely shared; that is, political scientists generally agree upon how best to measure the Court’s outputs. In this analysis, we employ an alternative estimate of the justices’ liberalism; one which we think better reflects the underlying ideological tenor of their policies. With data from 1953 to 1996, we compare time-series models using different indicators of the Supreme Court’s aggregate liberalism. Our results suggest that, in addition to being motivated by their own preferences, the justices are highly responsive to public mood, as well.

Time Period Covered1953 - 1996
Terms of Use
Network Terms of UseIQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

BY CLICKING THE "I AGREE" CHECKBOX BELOW, I CONFIRM THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD EACH AND EVERY TERM SET FORTH IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF DATA FOUND ABOVE, AND I AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

IF I DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, I MUST NOT DOWNLOAD THE MATERIALS.