Replication data for: Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
 
Citation Information
How to Cite
Kevin T. McGuire, 2007, "Replication data for: Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court", hdl:1902.1/10303 UNF:3:0qCUfg0C1zZcz9jsVjeBBA== Kevin T. McGuire [Distributor]
Study Global Idhdl:1902.1/10303
AuthorsKevin T. McGuire (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
Production Date1998
DistributorKevin T. McGuire Logo
Distributor Contactkmcguire@unc.edu
Distribution Date2007
Deposit Date2007
Replication ForKevin T. McGuire. 1998. "Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court". Political Research Quarterly 51:505-26. article available here
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

The solicitor general is widely believed to occupy a special status among the parties appearing in the U.S. Supreme Court. A broad array of theoretical advantages are thought to contribute to the federal government's influence, but scholars have no direct evidence of their impact. More importantly, virtually all existing research has failed to measure directly the influence of those advantages across other parties, as well. Estimating a series of probit models of executive success in the Court under both Democratic and Republican administrations, I test the impact of one such advantage, litigation experience, measured for all parties across all cases. The results suggest that, notwithstanding the conventional wisdom, there is nothing distinctive about the solicitor general's influence. Thus, existing explanations regarding the solicitor general's institutional prestige appear to overstate the importance of the executive's role in the Court.

Terms of Use
Network Terms of UseIQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

BY CLICKING THE "I AGREE" CHECKBOX BELOW, I CONFIRM THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD EACH AND EVERY TERM SET FORTH IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF DATA FOUND ABOVE, AND I AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

IF I DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, I MUST NOT DOWNLOAD THE MATERIALS.