Layna Mosley's Dataverse

Replication data for: Government-Financial Market Relations after EMU: New Currency, New Constraints?
hdl:1902.1/10506 UNF:3:8cC2pDY5VfFoXm8f3kuvjQ==
Version: 1 – Released: Wed Nov 28 00:00:00 EST 2007
Cataloging Information
Documentation, Data and Analysis
User Comments
Versions
 
If you use these data, please add the following citation to your scholarly references. Why cite?
Original Publication
Results found in this publication can be replicated using these data.
Mosley, Layna. 2004. "Government-Financial Market Relations after EMU: New Currency, New Constraints?" European Union Politics, 5 (2): 181–209. doi: 10.1177/1465116504042443. article available here.
Data Citation Details
Study Global IDhdl:1902.1/10506
AuthorsLayna Mosley (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
Production Date2004
DistributorLayna Mosley Logo
Distributor Contactmosley@unc.edu
Distribution Date2007
Deposit DateJuly, 2007
Provenance
Abstract and Scope
Abstract

The European Monetary Union (EMU) has generated a variety of changes, including the loss of national monetary policy autonomy and the creation of deeper integrated intra-European markets for goods, services, and financial instruments. This article explores the extent to which EMU has changed the ways in which and the extent to which international financial markets influence national policy choices. There are important reasons to expect that financial markets will exert greater influence on governments after EMU; for instance, governments now borrow in what is essentially a foreign currency. This change might serve to heighten the perceived danger of default in Europe. At the same time, however, financial markets appear to reward governments for the fiscal consolidation and increased market liquidity that flow from the single currency. I argue that, as a result of these offsetting trends, there have thus far been no dramatic changes in financial market–government relations. Although governments continue to face external pressures on domestic policy-making, these pressures may be only slightly more severe for EMU than for non-EMU countries. As in the past, domestic politics and institutions will be as important as, if not more important than, financial market pressures in EU governments’ policy decisions.

KeywordsEMU; financial globalization; government bond market; international capital markets; Stability and Growth Pact; Sweden
Time Period Covered1995 - 2003
Data Availability
Number of Files 3
Terms of Use
Dataverse Network Terms of Use
View Terms of Use [+]
IQSS Dataverse Network Terms and Conditions

By downloading these Materials, I agree to the following:

  1. I will not use the Materials to
    1. obtain information that could directly or indirectly identify subjects.
    2. produce links among the Distributor's datasets or among the Distributor's data and other datasets that could identify individuals or organizations.
    3. obtain information about, or further contact with, subjects known to me except where the use and/or release of such identifying information has no potential for constituting an unwarranted invasion of privacy and/or breach of confidentiality.
  2. I agree not to download any Materials where prohibited by applicable law.
  3. I agree not to use the Materials in any way prohibited by applicable law.
  4. I agree that any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that I create which employ data reference the bibliographic citation accompanying this data. These citations include the data authors, data identifier, and other information accord with the Recommended Standard (http://thedata.org/citation/standard) for social science data.
  5. THE DISTRIBUTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING OR RELATING TO THE DATASET

"Replication data for: Government-Financial Market Relations after EMU: New Currency, New Constraints?", hdl:1902.1/10506